Traumatic Brain Injury: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NoteBox|secondary}}<strong>Key articles</strong><hr> | {{NoteBox|secondary}}<strong>Key articles</strong><hr> | ||
{| style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" | |||
|- | |||
| style="width: 15%; vertical-align: top;" | [[IMPACT Study]] | |||
| style="width: 85%; vertical-align: top;" | ✓ the value of different prognostic factors in TBI ⇒ the most powerful independent prognostic variables identified were age, GCS motor score, pupil response, and CT finding (Marshall classification), labs (PT & glu) <i>(J [[Neurotrauma]]. 2007)</i> | |||
|} | |||
<hr> | |||
{| style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" | {| style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 05:26, 20 July 2024
Key articles
IMPACT Study | ✓ the value of different prognostic factors in TBI ⇒ the most powerful independent prognostic variables identified were age, GCS motor score, pupil response, and CT finding (Marshall classification), labs (PT & glu) (J Neurotrauma. 2007) |
DECRA | Efficacy of DC in severe TBI /w refractory ↑ ICP ⇒ DC ↓ ICP & ↓ ICU stay; assoc. /w worse fnx o/c at 6 mn. (N Engl J Med 2011) |
RESCUEicp | ✓ effectiveness of DC in pts /w TBI & refractory ↑ ICP ⇒ DC ↓ mortality; ↑ risk of severe disability & vegetative state compared to medical Tx alone. (N Engl J Med 2016) |
BEST-TRIP | ✓ ICP monitoring in pts /w severe TBI improves o/c ⇒ Tx focused on maintaining monitored ICP at ≤20 mmHg was not better to care based on CT and Px → routine ICP monitoring does not provide additional benefits for pts o/c (N Engl J Med 2012) |